Human rights issues have rarely, if ever, been a principal focus of political campaigns for president or even for Congress.  Over the past few years, however, human rights questions have played a more and more central role in how the United States is perceived around the world.  One of the rationales cited by President Bush for the war in Iraq, for example, was the need to establish a democratic state in the heart of the Middle East.  The “unsigning” of the treaty establishing the International Criminal Court; the U.S. prison camp at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba; the denial of habeas corpus to certain prisoners; revelations regarding U.S. use of torture—all these have colored the attitude of the international community toward America and thereby implicated U.S. national interests quite directly.  Moreover, the continuing saga of unstaunched death and destruction in Darfur, Sudan, has cast a pall over the reputation of every country that has failed to stop it. 

Given the relationship, then, of human rights controversies to U.S. policy and interests—the fact, for example, that how the world regards this country can have a very direct impact upon America’s national security and the need, in light of Iraq and Darfur, to clarify when in the future the United States should commit its blood and treasure to countering regimes that abuse human rights—one might assume that human rights would have been more central to the 2008 presidential campaigns to this point than in years past. 

The Center for American Progress Action Fund (CAPAF) has tracked the percentage of times candidates for president were asked questions about human rights in the presidential debates to this point in the campaign and has sought to ascertain the positions of all active candidates on seven key human rights questions.  The results of those studies will be released at a panel discussion moderated by CAPAF Senior Fellow William Schulz and including Karen DeYoung of the Washington Post, Gary Haugen of the International Justice Mission, and other commentators on human rights, politics, and the media today.

This event is co-sponsored by the University of Pennsylvania Press.

Super Tuesday and the Youth Vote will discuss the rise of the youth vote, its potential impact on the 2008 elections, and its impact on policy outcomes in 2008 and beyond. The panel will feature Kat Barr, director of education at Rock the Vote; Karlo Barrios Marcelo, research associate at the Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement (CIRCLE); Latoia Jones, executive director of College Democrats of America; and Ethan Eilon executive director of the College Republican National Committee. The panel will be moderated by Erica Williams, the Issue Campaigns Manager at Campus Progress Action.

Solar photovoltaic (PV) energy is an established technology that has proven its ability to improve our national security and boost the economy. Photovoltaics produce energy that is both domestic and emission-free, making it key to weaning the United States off our dependence on polluting fossil fuels and helping curb the effects of global warming. Solar PV also bolsters our economic security by creating more new jobs than any other energy technology.

Colorado has been a leader in developing policies to encourage investment in solar PV. This kind of leadership is instrumental in creating a policy environment friendly to solar generation, as energy policy is largely determined at the state level through laws and utility regulation. Please join us for the release of a new report from the Center for American Progress that highlights model state policies and case studies of four states, including Colorado, that have effectively developed thriving solar markets.