Romney Job Training Plan Would Lack Financing
His New Plan Conflicts with Republican Efforts to Eliminate Job Training Programs
SOURCE: AP/Julie Jacobson
Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney released a policy blueprint yesterday that outlines his support for job training programs. In it, Romney says his objective “is to retrain American workers to ensure that they have the education and skills to match the jobs of today’s economy.” Furthermore, he says, “in a period of chronic high unemployment such as we are enduring now, retraining workers to fill the opportunities in rising sectors of the new economy remains an especially vital task.”
Interestingly enough, the Center for American Progress Action Fund agrees with those statements. Retraining American workers is absolutely vital to accomplishing our complementary goals of putting Americans back to work and moving our economy forward. What is confusing, however, is how Romney plans to support job training programs if Republicans achieve their goal of eliminating funding for job training.
That’s right, only a few months ago Republicans in Congress tried to eliminate the majority of funding for federal job training programs. Earlier this year, House Republicans passed a shortsighted and potentially devastating bill (H.R. 1) to cut more than $4 billion from job training programs, including:
- Eliminating $3 billion for Workforce Investment Act employment and training programs
- Eliminating $200 million for Dislocated Worker employment and training programs
- Eliminating $125 million to train unemployed workers through community colleges
- Eliminating $100 million to educate and train at-risk youth
- Eliminating $100 million to educate and train ex-offenders
- Eliminating $100 million for additional job training programs
- Rescinding $300 million from the Job Corps
- Rescinding $75 million from other employment and training programs
These programs form the backbone of our federal investment in job training. By trying to eliminate these vital programs, Republicans expressed their disdain for assisting unemployed workers in their efforts to learn new skills and return to work. And Romney supported the Republican plan.
Of course, it’s entirely possible that Romney has reversed himself. It certainly wouldn’t be the first time. If Romney has reversed himself—and is now acknowledging that job training is “an especially vital task,” as he argued yesterday—then we look forward to hearing him disavow the Republican plan to cut all funding for job training.
The simple truth is that job-training programs are a long-term investment in American workers. For the United States to keep its leadership position in the global economy, our workforce must be able to keep pace with the knowledge and innovation that drives the development of new industries. That will require a sustained effort, and additional funding, to enroll more American workers in programs to improve their skills.
That’s why Republican efforts to eliminate job training are so destructive. They undermine our long-term economic competitiveness. If Mitt Romney is finally admitting the error of their ways, we welcome his reversal.
Stephen Steigleder is a policy analyst for the Economic Policy team at the Center for American Progress Action Fund working on higher education and workforce training issues.
To speak with our experts on this topic, please contact:
Print: Katie Peters (economy, education, poverty, Half in Ten)
202.741.6285 or firstname.lastname@example.org
Print: Anne Shoup (foreign policy and national security, energy, LGBT issues, health care, gun-violence prevention)
202.481.7146 or email@example.com
Print: Crystal Patterson (immigration)
202.478.6350 or firstname.lastname@example.org
Print: Madeline Meth (women's issues, higher education, Center for American Progress's Legal Progress)
202.741.6277 or email@example.com
Spanish-language and ethnic media: Tanya Arditi
202.741.6258 or firstname.lastname@example.org
TV: Lindsay Hamilton
202.483.2675 or email@example.com
Radio: Chelsea Kiene
202.478.5328 or firstname.lastname@example.org