The Neoconservatives' New Fight
With little notoriety, a major political storm is brewing over the
ratification of the U.N. Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). On
one side, an
impressive coalition has formed, uniting the Bush administration,
business
groups, environmentalists, oil companies, a large bipartisan majority
of U.S. senators, and 155 different nations under one tent. On the other side, a small contingent
of knee-jerk isolationists is threatening to sink a seemingly
non-controversial treaty that would "create
a system for negotiating drilling, mining, and fishing rights."
Revealing their core distrust of multilateralism, a familiar cadre of
right-wing voices such as former U.N. Ambassador John Bolton,
neconservative hawk Frank Gaffney, Sen. Jim Inhofe (R-OK), and others
are aggressively attempting to thwart passage of the UNCLOS treaty.
"The
opposition to the Law of the Sea is based entirely on a visceral
hatred for multilateral cooperation," writes Scott Paul, deputy
director of government relations for Citizens for Global
Solutions. "Its champions detest all forms of
international organization and believe the purpose of international law
is to constrain U.S. behavior." The same far-right ideologues who have
argued that the United States should feel unencumbered by international
law to go
to war, torture,
and pollute
are now raising their heads in opposition to the UNCLOS treaty. For
that
reason, the convention is the "the
perfect issue for progressives to rally around," writes The
American Prospect's Kate Sheppard, because "it reveals the outrage from
the outer edges of the right for what it
really is: anti-cooperative isolationism that is both unfounded in fact
and counter to American interests." Moreover, winning the battle over
the Law of the Sea is an
important step toward restoring America's international
reputation and paving the path for future international agreements on
climate change, weapons proliferation, and a host of other issues.
THE NEED FOR UNCLOS: Beginning
in
1973 and ending in 1982, representatives from 160 nations met regularly
under U.N. auspices to "hash
out concerns about military navigation rights, territorial
boundaries, environmental protections, and use of the ocean's
resources." The convention also established tribunals that would
resolve disputes that might arise between nations' interpretation of
their sea rights. Since
1982, the Law of the Sea has languished without U.S. ratification.
But new leadership in the Senate has bolstered hopes of
passage. Seventy percent of the earth's surface is covered by ocean,
and the mission of UNCLOS is to preserve
marine resources for future generations. The treaty binds all
nations to protect the "marine environment, protect fish stocks, and
prevent pollution with
as much care as the U.S. does." Former Republican Secretaries of
State James Baker and George Schultz write that the longer the United
States
delays ratification, the more it "compromises
our nation's authority to exercise its sovereign interests,
jeopardizes its national and economic security, and limits its
leadership role in international ocean policy." The UNCLOS would help
address such issues as the current
scrambling over the Arctic's mineral and energy reserves, helping
stave off military confrontations that could arise.
HELD CAPTIVE BY THE FAR RIGHT:
The far right has engaged in hyperbolic misrepresentations and
fear-mongering to rally the activist base against the treaty. CNN's
right-wing pundit Glenn Beck characterized it as a "socialist,
globalist, elitist" accord. Inhofe, who annually leads an
effort to defund
the United Nations, called it the "greatest
raid on sovereignty" in his lifetime. Bolton has been lobbying
lawmakers to oppose the treaty, despite the fact that just a
couple of years ago, he repeatedly
advocated for it. Gaffney has formed the Coalition to
Preserve American Sovereignty, which is stoking fear in the
right-wing base over the impact of a multi-national sea accord. Senate
Minority Whip Trent Lott (R-MS) has pledged his opposition, explaining,
"I'm not going to get in a
twit about what the Swiss or Belgians may think about us." Sens.
John Sununu (R-NH), Norm Coleman (R-MN), and George Voinovich (R-OH),
who all voted for the Law of the Sea in 2004, are now reconsidering
their votes in a clear pander to the activists. Even the Republican
presidential candidates are chiming in. "Let's
stop the Law of Sea Treaty," former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee (R)
said recently at the Values Voters Summit, drawing an ovation from
religious conservatives.
A TEST FOR PROGRESSIVES: The
battle of the UNCLOS treaty is a defining issue for progressives, both
because it reveals the failed unilateralist approach and restores
the principles of global cooperation. "You
have an agreement that's endorsed by a Republican president, the
Department of State, the Department of Defense, the Department of
Homeland Security, the U.S. Coast Guard, an overwhelming number of
senators from both political parties, business groups, trade
associations, and you already have 155 countries that are party to the
treaty. It seems like if you can't get that through, I don't know
what
kind of treaty you can get through the Senate," said Spencer Boyer,
director of international law and diplomacy for the Center for American
Progress. Scott Paul, who has been spearheading the awareness
campaign on the left, adds, "Winning the ratification battle would
seriously de-fang
the same
pugnacious nationalists who are on the opposite side of almost
every
important foreign policy issue facing the U.S."
|
|
|
|
Argentina elects its first woman president, Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner.
NEW
JERSEY: Gay couples say New Jersey's civil unions law has "not
provided the protections they had hoped for."
MISSOURI:
"Gov. Matt Blunt (R), an abortion opponent, has launched the state on a
scientific quest to determine how abortions affect women."
MINNESOTA:
School district "is fighting a string of court decisions ordering the
school to allow a gay-straight alliance access to school
facilities."
THINK
PROGRESS: The Washington Post in 2002 and 2007: President
Bush is trying to "prevent" war.
GLENN
GREENWALD: A bizarre exchange between a blogger and Gen. David
Petraeus's chief spokesman in Iraq.
ABU
AARDVARK: Too much focus on weekly body counts in Iraq misses the
point that "there is no possible winning strategy anymore."
TPM MUCKRAKER:
The House Judiciary Committee accidentally reveals whistleblower e-mail
addresses.
"Anyone who knows what waterboarding is could not be unsure. It
is a horrible torture technique. ... People who have worn the uniform
and had the experience know that this is a terrible and odious practice
and should never be condoned in the U.S. We are a better nation than
that."
-- Sen. John McCain (R-AZ), 10/25/07
VERSUS
GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS: You obviously feel strongly about this. Will Mr.
Mukasey have to say clearly that waterboarding is torture to get your
vote for attorney general? [...]
McCAIN: I can't be that absolute.
-- McCain, 10/28/07,
speaking about the Attorney General nomination of Michael
Mukasey




