Big Stakes In Bali
The environmental stakes are high for the tropical island of Bali if
the global community doesn't move forward to combat global warming. It
would likely face fiercer
and more frequent tropical storms, a rise
in sea levels, and an increase
in infectious diseases, among other disasters. It is therefore
fitting
that representatives from more
than 180 countries are gathered there this week and next for the U.N. Framework Convention
on Climate Change (UNFCCC). The primary objective of the conference
is to "draft a timeline to discuss
the global emission reduction policy that will succeed the Kyoto
Protocol," which will expire in 2012. The United States is now the only wealthy
industrialized nation that has rejected Kyoto, and the Bush
administration has made clear that it intends to resist
binding
international limits on carbon emissions at Bali. Show your support
here for the
United States to play a "positive leadership role" in drafting
a "visionary treaty" to fight climate change.
THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION'S POSITION:
In 2001, President Bush broke his
campaign pledge to seek greenhouse gas reductions and rejected the Kyoto Protocol
to limit
global warming emissions; the administration "has not
taken any of the UNFCCC negotiations seriously since." Bush skipped
U.N.-sponsored "road map" meetings in September, instead hosting a
separate gathering of the world's major emitters of
greenhouse gases, at which he pushed them to accept his misguided
framework of "voluntary" reductions. Earlier that month, Bush also
convinced leaders at the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation to agree to
a "long-term
aspirational goal" to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, instead of
binding targets. At Bali, Bush "remains
opposed to international constraints on curbing carbon emissions."
In the run-up to the UNFCCC this week, Bush administration officials
reportedly "established contact with representatives of the Chinese and
Indian governments in
an attempt to curb progress on climate protection initiatives."
Luckily, a "shadow
delegation of American business and political leaders" are also in
Bali to "advocate mandatory limits." This group includes Sens. John
Kerry (D-MA) and Barbara Boxer (D-CA), Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger
(R-CA), and former vice
president Al Gore.
THE REAL U.S. POSITION: The
Bush administration is more isolated than ever. With Bush's
close ally John Howard recently ousted, Australia has taken swift
action under new Prime Minister Kevin Rudd and signed the Kyoto
Protocol. "This is the first official act of the new Australian
Government, demonstrating my government's commitment to tackling
climate change," Rudd said in a statement issued hours after he was
officially sworn in Monday. Nevertheless, the United States "stood
firm" in
its opposition when asked by reporters about Australia's reversal. "We
do not see eye-to-eye with Australia or many other countries on the
signing of Kyoto, that's obvious," said Undersecretary of State
Nicholas Burns. Last week, officials from more than 150 companies
around the world -- worth "nearly
$4 trillion in market capitalization" -- signed a petition
demanding "urgent measures to cut greenhouse gas pollution at least in
half by 2050." More than 200 climate scientists released a similar
petition yesterday, arguing that "there
is no time to lose." "Clearly, the U.S. position is much
more advanced than the White House position," noted economist
Jeffrey Sachs, director of the Earth Institute at Columbia University
in New York and a special adviser to the United Nations.
GOOD NEWS FROM CONGRESS: Bush
may be frozen in time, but the rest of the United States is moving
forward. Yesterday, led by committee chairwoman Boxer, the Senate
Environment and Public Works Committee
voted 11-8 to pass
the Lieberman-Warner climate change bill, which would create a
"cap-and-trade system" and require the United States to cut global
warming pollution 15
percent by 2020, and emissions 63 percent from 2005 levels by
2050. Sen. John Warner (R-VA) called the legislation "a chance to give
America our opportunity...to be counted on this very very important
issue." The House will also vote on an energy
bill today that would, among other measures, mandate "a
40 percent increase in vehicle fuel efficiency standards to a
fleet-wide average of 35 miles per gallon" and "require that 15 percent
of power come from renewable sources by 2020." Even though this
legislation is supported
by the auto industry and United Auto Workers, but the White House
has indicated it may veto
it.
|
|
|
|
The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Wednesday blocked a Bush administration rule under the "Healthy Forests Initiative" that "allowed logging and burning projects in national forests without first analyzing their effects on the environment."
MASSACHUSETTS: "Nearly 300,000 people have obtained health insurance through the state's landmark initiative over the last 18 months."
FLORIDA:
"A key state official plans to vote against Florida's proposed new
science standards because evolution would be taught in public schools
to the 'exclusion of other theories of origin of life.'"
ECONOMY:
"A slumping housing market and skimpier sales tax collections will
force as many as 20 states to go back and patch holes in their budgets
in 2008."
THINK
PROGRESS: Like the State Department, Justice Department policies
discriminate against gay and lesbian employees.
POLITICAL
ANIMAL: Former Bush adviser Dan
Bartlett says the White House
speaks to conservative blogs because "they regurgitate exactly" the
message the administration wants to put out.
CLIMATE
PROGRESS: Wall Street Journal
editor insults scientists and attacks
Al Gore over climate change.
CARPETBAGGER
REPORT: Three out of four of Fox
News's primetime shows ignored the
new National Intelligence Estimate on the day it was released.
"To address these problems, the goal of Federal policy should be to
emphasize abstinence as the only certain way to avoid both unintended
pregnancies and STDs."
-- White House, 2/02
VERSUS
"The birth rate rose by 3 percent between 2005 and 2006 among
15-to-19-year-old girls, after plummeting 34 percent between 1991 and
2005."
--
Washington Post, 12/6/07




