|
Contact Us | Tell-a-Friend | Archives | Permalink | Subscribe to Feed
|
Regulatory Assault On Unions
The Bush administration's assault
on organized labor is well-known, as the current union organization
system is tilted against America's workers. Each year, over
20,000 U.S. workers are illegally fired, demoted, laid off,
suspended without pay, or denied work by their employers as a result of
union activity. In 2000, 13.5
percent of all wage and salary workers were unionized. In 2006, just 12 percent of workers were in unions,
as existing laws -- and the administration's interpretation of them --
make joining
a union a Herculean task that few want to undertake, even though
half of all U.S. workers say they would vote to join a union. While the Bush administration has been lax on
most
regulatory enforcement throughout most of government, a new report
from Center for American Progress Senior Fellow Scott
Lilly points out that the Labor
Department's Office of Labor
Management Standards (OLMS) has embarked on a path of "rigorous"
and "pernicious" regulatory
enforcement of organized labor. This regulatory assault has resulted in a "political
misinformation
campaign" aimed at damaging organized labor.
BURDENING AND SLANDERING UNIONS:
The Landrum-Griffin Act of 1959 "tasks
the Labor Department with enforcing
union financial reporting requirements and investigating their
finances." In 1992, former Rep. Newt Gingrich (R-GA) urged Labor
Secretary Lynn Martin to direct OLMS to significantly increase union
reporting requirements because it would "weaken our opponents and
encourage our
allies." The
Bush administration followed suit, revising the so-called LM-2
reporting form, resulting in a "radical
increase in paperwork requirements placed on unions." Unions
were thus forced to spend considerable sums in purchasing new software
to comply with the record-keeping burdens. "Most workers don't
have the time or ability to satisfy the requirements," observed
Bill Samuel, director of legislation for the AFL-CIO.
HEAVILY DOCTORED DATA: OLMS and
its right-wing allies appear to knowingly propagate misleading data in
order to drum up
allegations of union corruption. Using "double-counting"
(where the Department lists an individual case multiple times by
reporting as a separate "case" the date of indictment, charge, date of
plea, and date of sentencing), OLMS doubled the total number of
"convictions" in their data on criminal actions involving labor unions.
Much of those records did not even involve union members per se, but
accountants, lawyers, and business owners, observed John Lund of the
University of Wisconsin. This doctored data was also picked up by the
right-wing anti-union group Center
for Union
Facts. Furthermore, OLMS reporting on court-ordered
restitution to labor unions
is also misleading, reporting $23 million in court-ordered restitutions
in fiscal year 2005. But, as Lilly
observed, only 10 percent of that amount actually involved unions:
"embedded" in the data were "cases in which perpetrators were not
members of unions and the target of their crimes were not union
treasuries." "President Bush is using the Department of Labor
as a weapon to undermine the labor movement. ... The Bush administration's goal
is harassment, plain and simple," said Sen.
Hillary Clinton (D-NY).
POLITICAL APPOINTEES RUN OLMS:
The Bush administration's injection of politics over the rule of law is
well-documented. From the U.S.
Attorneys scandal to Karl Rove's politicization
schemes, the administration has used political appointees to
create an arm of
the Republican party in the federal government. OLMS was run
by a career civil servant for most of President
Clinton's tenure;
under Bush, political appointee Don Todd -- neither an attorney
nor an
individual with labor experience -- was chosen to run OLMS. Todd,
who
led opposition research at the Republican National Committee in 1988,
"is credited with helping
George H.W. Bush win the presidency in 1988 by convincing Lee
Atwater to use a television ad featuring a furloughed murderer." (Todd
was
named "RNC
Man Of The Year"
for this tactic.) Several other campaign operatives moved into the
office. Todd's special assistant came to the Labor Department
from the Republican Senate Campaign Committee, along with another
assistant, Patrick Bosworth. Sean Redmond, also special assistant to
Todd,
was on the advance staff of Bush-Cheney 2000. Todd and his staff used
their campaign communications experience to discredit unions, uploading
millions of pages of data on finances of unions to the OLMS website and
creating databases of legal actions taken in courts against
union members. This data was conveniently picked up by right-wing
groups like the Center
for Union Facts, who publicized "the
data that Todd had added" in their own anti-union ad
campaigns.
|
|
|
|
The research team that brings you The Progress Report and ThinkProgress.org needs spring interns! Click here for more information.
"Attorney General Michael B. Mukasey issued new restrictions yesterday on contacts between Justice Department and White House officials regarding ongoing criminal or civil investigations," a move that Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) said will "restore safeguards against political interference at the Department of Justice."
NEW JERSEY: Gov. Jon Corzine (D) announces an agreement with
Horizon Blue Cross Blue Shield "allowing working- and middle-class
families to obtain health insurance for children at drastically reduced
rates."
NEW
MEXICO: State Department of Health decides against reapplying for federal
abstinence-only education funds.
TEXAS:
"A Texas panel has been advised to approve an on-line Master's degree
course on teaching creationism."
THINK PROGRESS:
Top political talk show hosts dedicate 0.1 percent of their questions
to global warming.
AMERICA
BLOG: Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) will hold pro forma
sessions in the Senate over the holiday break in order to block
President Bush from making recess appointments.
COMMON
SENSE: A look at how Senate conservatives used record-breaking
obstructionism to block the "things that voters want their government
to do."
"C-SPAN is a public service...without editing, commentary or analysis
and with a balanced presentation of points of view."
-- C-SPAN.org
VERSUS
"This study's main finding is that C-SPAN coverage of think tanks
overwhelmingly favors conservative think tanks while left-of-center
think tanks are underrepresented."
-- Center for Economic Policy Research analysis, 12/07




