Bush Resumes Quest For Unchecked Powers
In August, Congress capitulated
to pressure from the Bush administration and passed the Protect
America Act, which temporarily
revised the Foreign Intelligence
Surveillance Act (FISA) by expanding the administration's surveillance
powers while gutting
congressional and judicial oversight.
The law, which contained a
sunset provision, is set to expire on Feb. 1. Last fall, Congress began
the process of re-working the legislation, aiming to maintain the
needed updates to the FISA law while correcting "the
most glaring deficiencies of the Protect America Act."
At the same
time, the White House insisted that it be given "the
power to grant legal immunity to telecommunications companies"
that
violate privacy laws by cooperating with the
administration's warrantless eavesdropping program, a
provision
that seriously
worries civil
liberties advocates. In
November, the House passed
the RESTORE Act, which did not include immunity. But the Senate was
unable to reconcile legislation passed by the Senate Intelligence
Committee that contained immunity with a
Senate Judiciary bill that did not.
Facing a filibuster threat from
Sens. Chris Dodd (D-CT) and Russ Feingold (D-WI), Senate Majority
Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) withdrew
the FISA legislation from consideration
before the winter break,
planning to return to it this month. Yesterday, the
Senate returned to the issue,
again facing differences
over "whether to
grant legal immunity to telephone companies."
AMNESTY
FOR POTENTIAL CRIMES: In
a speech
to the conservative Heritage Foundation yesterday, Vice President Dick
Cheney argued that the administration's push for retroactive immunity
is based on the "important principle" that "those who assist
the government in tracking terrorists should not be punished with
lawsuits." In reality though, the immunity "would reward
those who knowingly broke the law
and would undermine the
critical role played by service providers in ensuring that the
government
presents the required documentation before being given access to
intercepted
communications." Additionally, as Feingold pointed out, "existing
law already immunizes telephone companies that respond in good faith
to a government request, as long as that request meets certain clearly
spelled-out statutory requirements." "It's not
as if these companies don't have lawyers to tell them what's
legal and what's not," he wrote
on the site DailyKos.com. If
Congress does allow retroactive
immunity, it will not only encourage a potential repetition of
the illegal
eavesdropping that took place
after 9/11, but it would also protect
the administration itself from facing repercussions for ordering the
warrantless program by forcing dismissals of pending lawsuits
that could reveal the truth of
what took place.
FEARMONGERING FOR IMMUNITY: With
the expiration of the
temporary surveillance bill looming, Reid sought a temporary extension
this week in order to avoid "political
gamesmanship" while completing
the bill, but Senate conservatives
and
the White House objected and went on the attack. "To stall
legislation needed to help our intelligence community prevent
attacks and protect American lives is not
only irresponsible, it's also
dangerous," said Sen. Kit Bond
(R-MO), the ranking Republican on
the Intelligence Committee. Without the immediate passage of permanent
legislation, "terrorists" will soon "be free to make phone calls without
fear of being surveilled by U.S. intelligence agencies,"
threatened
White House spokesman Tony Fratto last week. "With
the day of reckoning so close at hand,
we're reminding Congress
that
they must act now," said Cheney in his speech yesterday. "Liability
protection,
retroactive to 9/11, is the right thing to do. It's the right way to
help
us prevent another
9/11 down the road," he added.
MORE
TO WORRY ABOUT THAN IMMUNITY:
The RESTORE Act passed by the House in November ably balanced national
security with civil liberties by giving "the government the powers it
says it needs to
intercept terrorist communications without
issuing a fishing license to spy on
innocent Americans." But the
Senate Intelligence bill, which the
White House is pushing as the only bill
it will accept, does
not provide the proper protections for the privacy of
Americans.
In the bill, the government is allowed "to acquire communications
between foreigners and Americans
inside the
United States, without a court order" as long as the foreigner is
outside the country and "the purpose is to obtain foreign intelligence
information," a term with "an extremely broad definition." In
the entire process of reforming FISA, the administration has shown outright
contempt for oversight by the
legislative and judicial branches.
The Senate Judiciary bill gives the secret FISA court "authority
to assess the government’s compliance
with its wiretapping
procedures, to place limits on
the use of information that was
acquired
through unlawful procedures, and to enforce its own orders." The Senate
Intelligence bill does not provide any such authority. If the Judiciary
bill is shot down by the full Senate, senators are expected
to offer amendments to try to improve
the oversight measures of the
Intelligence Committee bill.
|
|
|
|
"After decades of inattention to the possible psychiatric side effects of experimental medicines, the Food and Drug Administration is now requiring drug makers to study closely whether patients become suicidal during clinical trials."
MISSOURI: "Missouri's political landscape has been scrambled by Gov. Matt Blunt's (R) surprise resignation."
MINNESOTA: Transgender conservative announces bid for state House.
INDIANA: State Senate rejects amendment that would have "clarified whether contraceptives are among the drugs that pharmacists could refuse to dispense."
THINK
PROGRESS: Fox News's John Gibson
mocks "weirdo" Heath Ledger's
death: "He found out how to quit you."
HUFFINGTON
POST: Advertisers drop
conservative radio host Michael Savage over
his hateful remarks.
TOWLEROAD:
In an online video, former Vice President Al Gore endorses same-sex
marriage.
"The retired judge, confirmed as attorney-general earlier this month, has given 'high priority' to a review of confidential U.S. techniques."
-- Reuters, 11/27/07
VERSUS
"I said I would look at the program. Look at the letters. And give my answers. I haven't yet figured out precisely when and precisely how. I understand that the time is coming."
-- Attorney General Mike Mukasey, 1/23/08








